IOL Competition Format – Rules, Medals, 2026 Bucharest
Competition format

Two rounds. Five problem types. Six hours of language reasoning.

The International Linguistics Olympiad runs two consecutive rounds each summer — a six-hour individual contest and a three-to-four-hour team contest — for secondary-school students from forty-two participating countries. No prior linguistics is assumed; every problem is solvable from a short corpus and careful reasoning.

IOL 2026 Bucharest official promotional banner
Source: ioling.org · IOL 2026 Bucharest
Editions
22
2003 – 2025
Countries
42
most recent edition
Individual round
6 h
five problems
Team round
3-4 h
one extended problem
Team size
4
students per delegation
Who can compete

Eligibility — secondary-school students, age-gated by national selection.

IOL is open to secondary-school students typically aged 13 to 18. Each participating country runs its own national olympiad as a selection round; the top finishers in that national round form the country’s delegation to IOL. Most national olympiads accept students from grade 7 up.

To compete at IOL itself, a student must first qualify through their country’s national selection — we cannot enrol students directly. We can, however, help you find your national olympiad and recommend the sample problems that match its difficulty.

If your country does not yet have a national olympiad, the IOL Board accepts a small number of guest delegations; eligibility is reviewed case-by-case and the deadline is typically the end of February each year. See ioling.org for current guest-delegation policy.

01 · The individual round

Five problems, six hours, one solver.

The individual round is the longer and more famous of the two. Each contestant receives a packet of five problems spanning a range of linguistic phenomena, and has six hours to solve as many as they can. Working alone, with paper and pen only.

How a problem looks

A typical problem opens with a short corpus: ten to twenty sentences, phrases, or numerals in a language the contestant has never seen before, with English glosses for some but not all of them. The task is to derive the underlying linguistic pattern — phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, or numeral system — and then apply it to predict or translate previously unseen forms.

The languages chosen are often endangered, lesser-studied, or otherwise unlikely to have appeared in any school curriculum. Knowing the language is no advantage: the problem is solvable from the data alone, and prior speakers of the target language are not allowed to compete on problems featuring their first language.

Problems
5
per packet
Duration
6 h
single sitting
Points
100
total per problem
Allowed
0
electronic devices
Five problem types

Each contest covers five categories, one per problem.

TYPE 1

Phonology

Sound systems, vowel harmony, tone, stress patterns — reconstruct the rules from glossed data.

TYPE 2

Morphology

Word formation, agglutination, inflection paradigms — deduce affix order and stem alternations.

TYPE 3

Syntax

Word order, sentence structure, agreement — figure out how complex meanings are built from words.

TYPE 4

Semantics & pragmatics

Meaning, kinship terms, deictic systems, conventional implicature — understand context-bound usage.

TYPE 5

Numeral systems

Decimal, vigesimal, mixed-base counting — deduce the arithmetic structure from glossed numbers.

02 · The team round

One extended problem, three to four hours, four solvers.

The team round is held on a separate day from the individual round. Each delegation’s four contestants work together on a single, much larger problem — typically running fifteen to twenty pages of data and analysis — with three to four hours to complete it.

The team problem is usually open-ended: instead of asking solvers to predict specific forms, it asks them to construct a grammar, a writing system, or an analysis of a complex linguistic phenomenon from a corpus of evidence. Partial credit and elegance of reasoning matter as much as final answers.

Team scores combine into both an aggregate team ranking and individual team medals. The team round is widely regarded as the most enjoyable part of IOL by past contestants — the collaboration changes the texture of the puzzle entirely.

PROBLEM 15-20 pages 3 – 4 hours A B C D TEAM OF 4 – ONE COLLABORATIVE PROBLEM aggregate ranking + individual team medals
03 · Scoring and medals

Four tiers, set by cut-offs on individual-round scores.

Medals are awarded based on each contestant’s individual-round score, with cut-offs set after the contest. The team round produces its own separate ranking. Approximate proportions are based on past contests; final cut-offs vary year-to-year.

Tier 1

Gold

top ~8% of contestants

Highest individual scores. Typical cut-off lands around 75 – 85 of 100 possible points, though this varies sharply by year and problem set.

Tier 2

Silver

next ~12%

Strong individual performance. Most silver medalists solved three to four problems completely with partial credit on the others.

Tier 3

Bronze

next ~25%

Solid individual round. Typically two complete solutions plus meaningful progress on additional problems.

Tier 4

Honourable mention

notable problem solved

Awarded for solving any single problem completely and elegantly, even if total score did not reach the bronze cut-off. Recognises specialty over breadth.

Best Solution awards are also given for the most elegant solution to specific problems, separate from the medal tiers. Final cut-offs and award lists for any given year are published on ioling.org within a week of the closing ceremony.

04 · Rules summary

What you can and can’t bring into the contest hall.

These rules apply during both rounds. The IOL Board publishes the full official regulations on ioling.org; below is a plain-language summary for student preparation.

ALLOWEDWhat you can bring

  • +
    Pens and pencils — any number, any colour. Most solvers bring 3 – 4 sharpened pencils plus a couple of pens for final answers.
  • +
    Erasers and pencil sharpeners — non-electronic.
  • +
    Rulers and protractors — useful for laying out grammar tables and morpheme charts.
  • +
    Water bottles — non-tinted, label removed (the contest hall provides water during long sessions).
  • +
    Snacks — small wrapped items only. The individual round runs through lunch.

NOT ALLOWEDWhat stays outside

  • ×
    Any electronic device — phones, smartwatches, calculators, dictionaries, headphones. All collected at the door.
  • ×
    Paper dictionaries or reference books — the contest is a closed-book test of reasoning.
  • ×
    Notes from prior preparation — you cannot bring grammar cheat-sheets, formula cards, or training notes.
  • ×
    Communication with anyone outside the contest hall during the rounds. Bathroom breaks are supervised.
  • ×
    Problems featuring your first language — if a problem uses a language you speak natively, you are excused from that problem (and given a replacement).
05 · IOL 2026 Bucharest

The 23rd IOL convenes in Bucharest, 26 July to 2 August 2026.

Hosted by the University of Bucharest’s Faculty of Letters, the eight-day programme combines two contest days with cultural excursions, opening and closing ceremonies, and a jury session for delegation leaders. Below is the typical IOL week structure; exact dates for 2026 are published on ioling.org.

DAY 1 · 26 JUL

Arrival & opening

Delegations arrive in Bucharest. Registration. Opening ceremony at the University of Bucharest. Welcome dinner for contestants and team leaders.

DAY 2 · 27 JUL

Excursion & jury

Contestants on a cultural excursion (typically Bran Castle or Sinaia). Team leaders convene the international jury to finalise individual-round problems.

DAY 3 · 28 JUL

Individual round

The six-hour individual round runs in the main contest hall. Five problems, single sitting, paper-and-pen. Contestants typically leave the hall in the late afternoon.

DAY 4 · 29 JUL

Excursion & marking

Contestants on a second excursion. Markers begin grading individual-round papers. Team leaders translate team-round problem into delegation languages.

DAY 5 · 30 JUL

Team round

The three-to-four-hour team round. Each delegation’s four contestants collaborate on a single extended problem.

DAY 6 · 31 JUL

Coordination

Cross-delegation coordination: markers reconcile scores and discuss borderline cases with each team’s leaders. Contestants on an additional excursion or rest day.

DAY 7 · 1 AUG

Excursion & preparation

Final day of excursions. Award ceremony rehearsal in the evening. Cut-offs for gold, silver, bronze, and honourable mention are confirmed by the jury.

DAY 8 · 2 AUG

Closing ceremony

Medal presentations, best-solution awards, and closing remarks. Handover to the host delegation of IOL 2027. Departures begin in the evening.

Note: the above pattern reflects the typical IOL week; exact 2026 dates, contest start times, and excursion itineraries are confirmed by the IOL 2026 Bucharest organising committee on ioling.org closer to the contest.
06 · Frequently asked

Five questions students ask about the format.

i.
Do I need to know any particular language?
No. The contest tests reasoning applied to language data — every problem is solvable from the corpus alone, without prior exposure to the target language. In fact, speakers of a problem’s language are not allowed to solve that problem; you receive a replacement.
ii.
What language are the problems printed in?
Each contestant receives the packet in their preferred language. The IOL Board publishes the official problems in English; participating countries’ team leaders translate into delegation languages overnight before the round. Your contest packet is in the language you registered with through your national olympiad.
iii.
How are the five problems chosen?
Problems are proposed by a problem committee, drawn from the international community of olympiad organisers and academic linguists. Each year’s packet aims to cover the five categories — phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, and numeral systems — with one problem per category. Problems are tested by past medalists before the contest to calibrate difficulty.
iv.
Are partial answers worth anything?
Yes — in fact, partial credit is essential. Each problem is worth 100 points, with the rubric typically allocating points to each prediction and a separate block for the underlying analysis. Solving a problem completely without explaining how you got there will lose marks; explaining clearly while predicting only some forms still earns significant credit.
v.
How do I qualify for IOL 2026?
Through your national olympiad. Find your country’s selection round (NACLO in the US and Canada; UKLO in the United Kingdom; OZCLO in Australia and New Zealand; and similar in roughly forty other countries). Top finishers form the delegation of up to four students. National olympiads typically run between November of the prior year and March of the contest year. See /contact/ if you need help locating your national round.